Using SOC-as-a-Service to Operationalize CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Requirements

CMMC 2.0 is no longer a future compliance program. It is now fully anchored in federal rulemaking and tied directly to defense contract eligibility. The program rule establishing the CMMC framework is in effect, and the DoD acquisition rule has formally embedded CMMC requirements into DFARS. As of November 10, 2025, contracting officers are authorized to include CMMC requirements directly in solicitations and awards, with limited exceptions for COTS-only contracts.

The DoD is executing a phased rollout over roughly three years. The first phase, running through November 2026, emphasizes Level 1 and Level 2 self-assessments with mandatory affirmations submitted into SPRS. Later phases introduce required third-party Level 2 assessments and expanded Level 3 coverage. Full implementation across most DoD contracts is expected by late 2028.

From a CISO perspective, this shifts CMMC from planning exercise to live contract gate. Certification status is visible in SPRS and directly influences award eligibility. SOC-as-a-Service now functions as part of the operational foundation that supports that status rather than as a future enhancement.


Positioning SOCaaS Inside a CMMC 2.0 Program

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 aligns directly with the NIST 800-171 control set and centers on protecting CUI under real operating conditions. SOCaaS does not replace internal security policy, system hardening, or POA&M ownership. What it does provide is the continuous detection, investigation, incident handling, and evidence generation that many organizations struggle to sustain internally at full scale.

With enforcement underway, assessors and contracting officers focus on practical execution, not documentation alone. The critical questions remain whether audit logs are genuinely reviewed, whether incidents are detected and handled in a documented way, and whether contractors can produce defensible records that support their self-attestations and assessments.

SOCaaS directly supports each of those expectations by converting continuous monitoring into case-based operational evidence.


AU: Audit and Accountability Backed by SOCaaS

The AU domain requires that audit logs exist, are protected, are reviewed, and are retained across in-scope systems. SOCaaS satisfies these expectations by centralizing log ingestion and enforcing continuous review.

Telemetry is collected from servers, endpoints, identity providers, VPN infrastructure, network security devices, cloud platforms, and business systems that interact with CUI. Analysts evaluate events for suspicious behavior and document investigative outcomes. These records demonstrate that logs are not merely retained but actively reviewed and acted upon.

During assessment, this allows organizations to present living audit evidence rather than static configuration screenshots. The existence of validated alert cases tied to authentication attempts, privilege changes, and system anomalies directly supports AU objectives.


IR: Incident Response That Produces Assessment-Ready Artifacts

The IR domain requires structured handling of security incidents from detection through recovery. SOCaaS operationalizes this through managed escalation workflows, analyst validation, and documented containment actions.

When a high-risk event surfaces, the provider opens a formal case that records detection time, investigation steps, affected systems and users, containment actions, and remediation recommendations. These records show that incidents are not handled informally or inconsistently.

For a CMMC Level 2 assessment, this history provides concrete proof that the organization can detect and manage real security events rather than merely maintain written response plans.


SI: System and Information Integrity in Practice

The SI domain focuses on detecting malicious activity, reporting it, and correcting affected systems. SOCaaS supports this domain through continuous behavioral analysis across hosts, users, and network traffic.

From an assessor’s standpoint, the emphasis rests on whether malicious behavior is actually identified and acted upon near real time. SOCaaS provides the detection layer and produces documented investigations that show correction and follow-up occurred. That operational trail bridges the gap between policy intent and daily execution.


AC, CM, and Other Domains: Detection of Deviations

SOCaaS does not enforce access control or configuration baselines directly. It does, however, detect when deviations occur. Privileged group changes, service account misuse, anomalous authentication behavior, and insecure configuration changes generate log activity. When those events result in SOC cases or incidents, the organization gains provable evidence that deviations are visible and escalated.

From a certification standpoint, this strengthens discussions around AC and CM because organizations can demonstrate that violations are detected and addressed rather than remaining unseen.


Phased Rollout and SOCaaS Across Phases

During the first enforcement phase, contractors rely heavily on self-assessments and submitted affirmations. SOCaaS provides the operational proof needed to support those submissions with real monitoring and response data.

As mandatory third-party Level 2 assessments expand in later phases, SOCaaS output becomes primary assessment evidence. Assessors will request incident records, alert histories, and case documentation covering extended time windows. SOCaaS provides that historical depth without requiring organizations to assemble evidence retroactively.

As additional phases bring more contracts under CMMC control, SOCaaS remains one of the few controls that demonstrates continuous operation across multi-year audit cycles.


Conditional Certification, POA&Ms, and the Role of SOCaaS

Under the acquisition rule, contractors may in certain cases receive conditional Level 2 certification while closing documented POA&M items within a defined window. SOCaaS plays a practical role in this process.

First, it exposes real gaps through detection and incident data rather than theoretical risk analysis. Second, once remediation steps are implemented, SOCaaS provides evidence that the corrective actions are functioning through reduced recurrence or different investigation outcomes. This operational validation strengthens the transition from conditional to final certification.


Data Handling, DFARS, and Forensic Records

With CMMC now embedded into DFARS, enforcement places increased scrutiny on how security logs and forensic records are handled. SOCaaS providers supporting defense contractors must demonstrate regional data handling, restricted administrative access, and defensible chain-of-custody practices for logs tied to CUI systems.

Hybrid telemetry models that retain sensitive payloads internally while forwarding metadata for external analysis allow organizations to meet both monitoring requirements and contractual data handling expectations.

When reviewing a SOCaaS provider through a CMMC lens, CISOs should confirm where logs are stored, who can access them, how long they are retained, and how easily raw evidence can be exported for assessment or investigation purposes.


How a CISO Can Use SOCaaS for CMMC 2.0 Alignment

Within a CMMC 2.0 program, SOC-as-a-Service now plays three distinct operational roles.

It provides continuous monitoring and managed incident handling across in-scope environments that store or process FCI and CUI.

It produces assessment artifacts in the form of validated alerts, investigation timelines, analyst notes, and remediation documentation that map directly into AU, IR, SI, and adjacent domains.

It supports contract survivability by helping maintain defensible CMMC status in SPRS with operational proof rather than paper compliance.

CMMC 2.0 has entered its enforcement phase. SOCaaS now functions as one of the most direct methods for converting that enforcement pressure into sustained, provable operational security that holds up under assessment, contracting review, and post-incident scrutiny.


How Can Netizen Help?

Founded in 2013, Netizen is an award-winning technology firm that strengthens organizations by delivering cybersecurity capabilities that improve visibility, response, and resilience across modern environments. In the context of SOC-as-a-Service, our mission is centered on helping government, defense, and commercial clients build incident readiness without the burden of standing up a full in-house SOC. Our team develops and supports advanced monitoring, detection, and response solutions that give customers the level of coverage and operational structure they need to protect their networks, identities, and cloud workloads.

Our “CISO-as-a-Service” offering already demonstrates how we extend executive-level expertise to organizations that need high-end guidance without internal hiring. The same principle applies to our SOC; Netizen operates a state-of-the-art 24x7x365 Security Operations Center that provides continuous monitoring, alert triage, detection engineering, incident response coordination, and threat hunting for clients that require dependable coverage. These services support the readiness goals outlined in this article by improving early detection, reducing breakout time, and offering access to specialized analysts and hunters who understand the demands of sensitive and regulated environments.

Our portfolio complements SOCaaS by including cybersecurity assessments and advisory, hosted SIEM and EDR/XDR services, software assurance, penetration testing, cybersecurity engineering, and compliance audit support. This allows organizations to integrate SOCaaS with broader security initiatives such as modernization projects, compliance readiness, and vulnerability management. We specialize in environments where strict standards, technical precision, and operational consistency are mandatory, which makes our team a natural partner for organizations working to raise their detection and response maturity.

Netizen maintains ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 20000-1, and CMMI Level III SVC registrations, reflecting the stability and maturity required for a high-quality SOC operation. As a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business certified by the U.S. Small Business Administration, we have been recognized repeatedly through the Inc. 5000, Vet 100, national Best Workplace awards, and numerous honors for veteran hiring, innovation, and organizational excellence.

Looking for expert guidance to secure, automate, and streamline your IT infrastructure and operations? Start the conversation today.


Posted in , , ,

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.